.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
   Welcome to my blog! I'll be posting thoughts about art, photos, happenings, and other things that strike me--and hopefully my readers--as interesting. And please visit my website by clicking the link to the right--thanks!

   Also please check out my second blog, The Painting Archives to see older (pre-2004) paintings for sale.

Tuesday, May 08, 2012
  critique, part two

Do I need to convince you that receiving constructive feedback on your work is a good thing? Probably not--most of us would like to know more about how our work is perceived by other people, and know from experience how helpful other people's insights can be. Interesting then the lengths we will go to avoid that conversation, even with good friends. I've come up with eight strategies that artists use to deflect honest, deep conversation about their work--I'm sure there are more!-- and I speak from experience. Not only have I observed these in action, I've prone to a few of these myself.

So, imagine yourself in your studio, with one or more visitors looking at your work, the setting for an informal critique. They may be friends, other artists you know, family members, curious neighbors. The purpose of the visit is not to sell your work (I'll save that topic for another post) but simply to show what you've been doing, and get some feedback. It is very likely that your audience has something of value to offer by way of insight, suggestion or reaction. Will you find out? Maybe not, if you retreat too far into any of the following defenses:

1. Saying, in essence: "Everything I do is great! I am so pleased with all of these!! Aren't they fantastic!?" (subtext: "You are not allowed to voice any criticism.")

2. Saying, in essence: "Everything I do is awful. I hate everything here. I am really bad at this." (subtext: "You'd better tell me only good things, or you will completely crush me.")

3. Going on and on about topics unrelated to the artwork on view. (subtext: "I am hoping to kill all our time before a single word of substance can be spoken about the work.")

4. Being silent, tense, wary. (subtext: "Please just go away.")

5. Rushing the viewer through the studio, giving them no more than 5 seconds to see each piece. (subtext, "I'm afraid to hear what you have to say, let's just get this over with as soon as possible.")

6. Talking only about the materials or technical aspects of the work. (subtext: "I'm an expert at this and that's all you need to know.")

7. Talking about the meaning of the work using art jargon instead of normal speech. (subtext: "I have been to art school and that's all you need to know.")

8. Talking only about sales, exhibits, collectors, and other aspects of success. (subtext, "Other people love my work and that's all you need to know.")

OK, I'm teasing a little here--I know that being scrutinized by other people, even ones you know and trust, can be very uncomfortable. Underlying all of these strategies is the fear of rejection and negative criticism by the audience--hence the desire to push the viewers away before anything bad can be said. This is usually effective, because despite wanting to see your work, the audience in your studio may also feel put on the spot, unsure and a little ill at ease. They want to say the right things, intelligent things, but may not enjoy the pressure to do so. The assumption by everyone in the room is that you are engaged in a judging, and being judged scenario, and the natural inclination is for an easy way out.

But you--the artist--can do everybody a favor by putting a different agenda into play. The first step, difficult as it may be, is to let go of the need for approval and praise. This frees you from the defensive strategies above and allows you to focus on open ended conversation about your art. Your studio visitors too will be free to move beyond liking or disliking, which may not a comfortable role for them either. (Of course, if they do like the work and say so, that's a fine starting point!) Here are a few suggestions for opening up dialogue next time someone comes to see your work:

As your visitors come in, talk casually about the work you have out to give them time to orient themselves to what's what. For example, you can indicate older and newer pieces, and things in progress. Mention ideas you're interested in and point out some relevant examples of how you're applying them. Don't launch into a big lecture, just do a few minutes of this to give your audience a chance to look around and get curious. That may be all you have to do--comments and questions will ensue and the conversation will flow. If you need some other conversational help, though, you can try working in some questions...ask what was the first impression of the work, and what came through after looking a few minutes longer. Or about how the person's eyes are drawn within a particular piece, if he or she thinks it would work on a much larger or smaller scale, or if there are any distinct emotions or ideas that come to mind in viewing the work, or which of the finished pieces on view would that person choose to put in an exhibit. You don't need to grill the person--these are just prompts to get a studio visitor engaged with the work, thinking and talking.

With people whose subjective opinion you trust, the questions can be more pointed and the feedback you request more specific as to whether something is working, or whether a particular direction seems promising. If you have an art friend who is direct and honest, the conversation can range from helpful suggestions to deep probing and revealing insights. In the end, the best informal critiques are not controlled by your expectations or questions--they take off into unexpected territory, and leave you with energy, new ideas, and all the art synapses in your brain firing.

(the untitled painting above is 16"x16" oil and mixed media on panel.)
that list of defensive comments does seem to be all I hear when I visit other peoples work and studios and oh no! probably I do that too. Your suggestions for letting viewers get oriented and then drawing them out I will put into practice at my featured artist show in June. I really do want the feedback. I always note which paintings people gravitate to but I often fall into the trap of going into the technical aspects and materials rather than just prompting others. thank you for these timely comments
Hi Rebecca,

I am really enjoying these posts about critiquing. I must admit to using a few of the defensive comments or my most often used "silence" and nodding and not wanting to take in what the viewer has to say...mostly I think I do this because my work is intuitive and spontaneous and so I feel that what appears is how it should be...I am now ready though to get some critical feedback and hope I am more open to what others have to say. Thank you for this.
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


     September 2005 /      October 2005 /      November 2005 /      December 2005 /      January 2006 /      February 2006 /      March 2006 /      April 2006 /      May 2006 /      June 2006 /      July 2006 /      August 2006 /      September 2006 /      October 2006 /      November 2006 /      December 2006 /      January 2007 /      February 2007 /      March 2007 /      April 2007 /      May 2007 /      June 2007 /      July 2007 /      August 2007 /      September 2007 /      October 2007 /      November 2007 /      December 2007 /      January 2008 /      February 2008 /      March 2008 /      April 2008 /      May 2008 /      June 2008 /      July 2008 /      August 2008 /      September 2008 /      October 2008 /      November 2008 /      December 2008 /      January 2009 /      February 2009 /      March 2009 /      April 2009 /      May 2009 /      June 2009 /      July 2009 /      August 2009 /      September 2009 /      October 2009 /      November 2009 /      December 2009 /      January 2010 /      February 2010 /      March 2010 /      April 2010 /      May 2010 /      June 2010 /      July 2010 /      August 2010 /      September 2010 /      October 2010 /      November 2010 /      December 2010 /      January 2011 /      February 2011 /      March 2011 /      April 2011 /      May 2011 /      June 2011 /      July 2011 /      August 2011 /      September 2011 /      October 2011 /      November 2011 /      December 2011 /      January 2012 /      February 2012 /      March 2012 /      April 2012 /      May 2012 /      June 2012 /      July 2012 /      August 2012 /      September 2012 /      October 2012 /      November 2012 /      December 2012 /      January 2013 /      February 2013 /      March 2013 /      April 2013 /      May 2013 /      June 2013 /      July 2013 /      August 2013 /      September 2013 /      October 2013 /      November 2013 /      December 2013 /      January 2014 /      February 2014 /      March 2014 /      April 2014 /      May 2014 /      June 2014 /      July 2014 /      August 2014 /      September 2014 /      October 2014 /      November 2014 /      December 2014 /      January 2015 /      February 2015 /      March 2015 /      April 2015 /      May 2015 /      June 2015 /      July 2015 /      August 2015 /      September 2015 /      October 2015 /      November 2015 /      December 2015 /      January 2016 /      February 2016 /      March 2016 /      April 2016 /      June 2016 /      July 2016 /      August 2016 /      September 2016 /      October 2016 /      November 2016 /      December 2016 /      January 2017 /      February 2017 /      March 2017 /      May 2017 /      June 2017 /      July 2017 /      August 2017 /      September 2017 /      October 2017 /      November 2017 /      December 2017 /      January 2018 /      March 2018 /      April 2018 /

       Rebecca Crowell