.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
   Welcome to my blog! I'll be posting thoughts about art, photos, happenings, and other things that strike me--and hopefully my readers--as interesting. And please visit my website by clicking the link to the right--thanks!

   Also please check out my second blog, The Painting Archives to see older (pre-2004) paintings for sale.

Tuesday, May 21, 2013
  the artist's voice
What does it mean to have a unique, personal “voice” in abstract painting, and how does an artist arrive at one? (Or, in some cases, more than one --and is that OK?) How can abstract work, however personal and meaningful to the artist, communicate meaning to others?

I’ve been working on a presentation for my upcoming Master Class at Shake Rag Alley (Mineral Point, WI) on these topics, which arise often in all of my Oil&Wax Workshops, from the introductory level through more advanced levels. Along with new techniques, the artists in my classes naturally want to bring meaning and personal style to this new way of working, and for it to have a unique and individual quality that viewers will be drawn into. Some are new to abstraction—sensing that there is more to it than creating pleasing visual compositions—but unsure of how to find their way. Some have been working abstractly for years but are looking for a stronger connection between their work and their inner lives—for what can be brought into the work that will make it stronger and more individualized. Others are looking for a way to integrate diverse styles or voices, or perhaps to find a way to cast old habits aside.

Questions about meaning, personal voice , how to infuse our work with our individuality and how to communicate with viewers are some of the most important ones that we can ask, in any style or medium. But for the abstract artist, creating ‘something out of nothing” these issues are especially challenging. All of the discussions and presentations I use in my workshops address the issue of personal voice and meaning in one way or another—I have made power points on abstraction, form and content, visual thinking and self-critique—but my latest presentation addresses these issues more directly. I am interested enough in this topic to consider expanding my ideas at some point into book form, but for now I have this synopsis:

I would define voice or style as a consistent, but not rote, approach to painting that arises from an artist’s own experience. It is like a personal language --expressive, flexible, and able to be discerned by others. It evolves out of reflection and inner knowledge, and possesses its own logic and consistency. When other people can hear and respond to that voice, an artist is communicating.

In abstraction, specific meaning is rarely the point, but rather a stage has been set to engage the viewer’s own imagination, associations, and memories. It is surprisingly hard to find that stage in a way that also reflects the artist’s own individuality, and creates the possibility for a visual dialogue with the viewer.

While style is made up of basic art elements—line, color, texture, composition and the rest—manipulating or analyzing these is only one way in which artists create and viewers understand the work. There is something harder to define—a reflection of the artist’s character, personality and what they have lived through that comes through and distinguishes the work of one mature artist from another, even if they are superficially similar. I liken it to the way that we can recognize a friend toward us from quite a distance—the persons gait, stance, height, the shape of their clothing—all combine to give us the right clues. There is the sense of knowing the person intuitively—just as we can know a Pollock from a DeKooning at a glance. Paintings too have a character, an energy that is highly personal.

Even when an artist works in different styles or approaches over the years, a consistency is usually evident that gets back to this basic, hard to define character. Because of this, I see no need to advise anyone to stay with, or to seek only one style or voice, as long as the work is coming form the core. Over time, there may be cross-pollination and integration of one’s various voices, and this can lead to some very interesting work. Or the work may remain as distinct bodies or series of work and speak about that particular time in a person's life and experience.

How does an artist infuse a painting with individuality and character? What are some ways to access thecore, and connect with deep aspects of the self? (I do believe that the deeper we go into our own individuality, the better we will connect with viewers. That may seem paradoxical—but aren't we all more connected more strongly in deep, rather than superficial ways?)

The most important thing I can say about the process of digging deep is that it takes time and patience. But it is an exciting journey—fueled by ideas from the outer world (from other artists, museum visits, art books and from absolutely anything else that elicits interest in the artist) as well as from the inner world of dreams, memories and ideas. All of this in addition to long hours in the studio! In my presentation I discuss such practical tips as keeping a visual journal, making lists of influences and sources, and looking for clues in older work about persistent ideas, symbols or content that can be carried forth.

On a very simple level, there is only one thing to know. The voice is already there, and just needs to be brought forth. Many artists have described this process as “getting out of my own way” and certainly, the subconscious is a powerful source of artistic voice. But I advocate feeding the conscious mind too—reading, writing, studying other artists, keeping journals, sketching, investigating anything that pulls you in. What is added to the subconscious voice by being well-informed, curious and introspective may well what give your artistic voice a distinctive character.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this, Rebecca. The artist's voice is such a difficult thing to pinpoint, and you've so eloquently described both the journey and the destination. Lovely!
So eloquently put Rebecca. Defining the artist from the inner self and finding that voice has always been a mystery to me. You have brought clarity,thank you..

Lee Anne La forge
Thank you Rebecca for your insight into the philosophical question of voice in the artistic journey that compels us to paint.
Post a Comment

<< Home


     September 2005 /      October 2005 /      November 2005 /      December 2005 /      January 2006 /      February 2006 /      March 2006 /      April 2006 /      May 2006 /      June 2006 /      July 2006 /      August 2006 /      September 2006 /      October 2006 /      November 2006 /      December 2006 /      January 2007 /      February 2007 /      March 2007 /      April 2007 /      May 2007 /      June 2007 /      July 2007 /      August 2007 /      September 2007 /      October 2007 /      November 2007 /      December 2007 /      January 2008 /      February 2008 /      March 2008 /      April 2008 /      May 2008 /      June 2008 /      July 2008 /      August 2008 /      September 2008 /      October 2008 /      November 2008 /      December 2008 /      January 2009 /      February 2009 /      March 2009 /      April 2009 /      May 2009 /      June 2009 /      July 2009 /      August 2009 /      September 2009 /      October 2009 /      November 2009 /      December 2009 /      January 2010 /      February 2010 /      March 2010 /      April 2010 /      May 2010 /      June 2010 /      July 2010 /      August 2010 /      September 2010 /      October 2010 /      November 2010 /      December 2010 /      January 2011 /      February 2011 /      March 2011 /      April 2011 /      May 2011 /      June 2011 /      July 2011 /      August 2011 /      September 2011 /      October 2011 /      November 2011 /      December 2011 /      January 2012 /      February 2012 /      March 2012 /      April 2012 /      May 2012 /      June 2012 /      July 2012 /      August 2012 /      September 2012 /      October 2012 /      November 2012 /      December 2012 /      January 2013 /      February 2013 /      March 2013 /      April 2013 /      May 2013 /      June 2013 /      July 2013 /      August 2013 /      September 2013 /      October 2013 /      November 2013 /      December 2013 /      January 2014 /      February 2014 /      March 2014 /      April 2014 /      May 2014 /      June 2014 /      July 2014 /      August 2014 /      September 2014 /      October 2014 /      November 2014 /      December 2014 /      January 2015 /      February 2015 /      March 2015 /      April 2015 /      May 2015 /      June 2015 /      July 2015 /      August 2015 /      September 2015 /      October 2015 /      November 2015 /      December 2015 /      January 2016 /      February 2016 /      March 2016 /      April 2016 /      June 2016 /      July 2016 /      August 2016 /      September 2016 /      October 2016 /      November 2016 /      December 2016 /      January 2017 /      February 2017 /      March 2017 /      May 2017 /      June 2017 /      July 2017 /      August 2017 /      September 2017 /      October 2017 /      November 2017 /      December 2017 /      January 2018 /      March 2018 /      April 2018 /      May 2018 /      June 2018 /      August 2018 /      September 2018 /      October 2018 /

       Rebecca Crowell