.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
   Welcome to my blog! I'll be posting thoughts about art, photos, happenings, and other things that strike me--and hopefully my readers--as interesting. And please visit my website by clicking the link to the right--thanks!

   Also please check out my second blog, The Painting Archives to see older (pre-2004) paintings for sale.


Tuesday, May 15, 2012
  critique, part three


A good critique, I think, is an in-depth, constructive conversation about an artist’s work; my last post gave some ideas for facilitating that dialogue. Key to a good critique is a degree of control that the artist has over the situation-- choosing in advance what to show, and in a situation in which you feel at ease, open, ready to speak and listen.

But most of us have found ourselves in uncomfortable situations that I call pseudo-critiques. More or less unexpectedly, you are confronted with unsolicited and unhelpful advice, criticism, or analysis. A situation like that is not to be confused with an actual critique, since there is no genuine conversation. They are more like sneak attacks, and put the artist in a defensive position. It may help to be aware of a few likely scenarios where pseudo-critiques may happen. These include:

At a gallery reception. It may be argued that when the work in on public view, it is open for criticism, and that’s fine in a written review. But I don’t feel that the reception is the time and place --it’s hard enough for the artist to stand around for two or three hours being pleasant and outgoing without having someone lecturing about what changes are needed in a certain painting or that the work is obviously derivative of so and so’s. (Both are pseudo-critiques I have endured at openings.) After all the artist has been through to put on the show, the reception is a time to take in some glory and celebrate.

During an appointment with a gallery director. The gallery needs to decide if work is in line with its vision and client preferences, but criticism is uncalled for. A restrained “I’m afraid your work isn’t a good fit for us” is standard, along with some polite chit chat to ease the tension. Of course, the artist might decide to ask for reasons if the work is rejected, and that could be helpful and informative, but it isn’t required. Many will find the situation to be judgmental enough as it is. (Again, I speak from experience, having endured –years ago--a humiliating lecture from a gallery director about my lack of color sense…I had to wonder why she’d agreed to look at it in the first place.)

With uninvited studio visitors. When a friend or relative decides to drop in to an artist’s studio, you are should steer clear of any urge to defend, explain, or apologize for what you have going on. Quite likely the current painting will be in a state of chaos and confusion—at least that’s how the timing usually works for me. But even if everything looks great, an uninvited visitor should wait to be asked before saying much—even positive remarks can actually be unwelcome (such as the dreaded, “don’t touch that, it’s perfect as it is!”) Again, you may choose to invite dialogue, if there’s a gut feeling that this is the right time, and the right person. If not, it’s easy enough to treat the situation as the casual drop in that it is, and talk about anything but the art.

When guests scrutinize artwork hanging in your home. One time, a visitor of mine told me that one of my dark charcoal drawings too depressing for the living room. I couldn’t think of a thing to say in response. Would we criticize anything else in somebody’s house? I suppose some people would, but considering the personal nature of art and artistic taste this is not a good idea. At the risk of being repetitious-- there’s no need to defend or explain.

When passers-by comment on artists working in public. Artists painting on location are usually not doing so to attract an audience or a steady stream of comments, and they’re under no obligation to educate or entertain. Some may choose to do so, but at their own discretion. Most will be trying hard to tune out any distractions.

These scenarios all put the artist in an awkward, distracted or defensive position. How to handle them? The same strategies that work against you in a legitimate critique setting (see my last post) can come in handy when you really don’t want to encourage the conversation. Or a polite (if slightly sarcastic) “thanks for the feedback” and a quick change of subject will do.

On the other hand, in any situation you can also make the choice to engage in dialogue about your work, if you are so inclined--if you sense that there’s something of value to be gained. The hard part (I know from experience) is to keep your wits about you and not get drawn in where you don’t want to go.

The painting above, Blue Vestige, is 24"x24", oil and mixed media on panel, finished today.
 
Comments:
What a great series on the art of the critique. This should be required reading for any artist or art group that wants to grow and take on this challenge.
Asking for a critique is not for sissies, it takes an open mind and sturdy constitution. But oh! the benefits!
Thank you for stating these ideas so clearly and concisely.
 
Hi Rebecca
When I read your blog about Critique it hit me that it could be a very valuable on line course. I would have loved to come to it but I live In Vancouver Canada. If you ever do something like that I would be interested. I found your writing on the subject helpful and interesting.
Thank you
Kathleen Menges
 
Thanks for the great comments! It's been an interesting subject to think about at length. @Kathleen--I wish I had more time to do what you suggest, it's a good idea. But the truth is I am very busy already...I just hope to provide some food for thought via these posts and hope others will find them of value.
 
Thanks again Rebecca for this last post...what would still be helpful for me is what to do "with" the critique...as art is so personal, especially intuitive abstract work...does one try to change the work in line with the critique? as there are many directions a work could go...what to do? Not having gone to grad school yet having a circle of artists...whose advice should I hede? Finding the right group is key, yet sometimes great critique comes from an unpredictable source???
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

       www.rebeccacrowell.com




     September 2005 /      October 2005 /      November 2005 /      December 2005 /      January 2006 /      February 2006 /      March 2006 /      April 2006 /      May 2006 /      June 2006 /      July 2006 /      August 2006 /      September 2006 /      October 2006 /      November 2006 /      December 2006 /      January 2007 /      February 2007 /      March 2007 /      April 2007 /      May 2007 /      June 2007 /      July 2007 /      August 2007 /      September 2007 /      October 2007 /      November 2007 /      December 2007 /      January 2008 /      February 2008 /      March 2008 /      April 2008 /      May 2008 /      June 2008 /      July 2008 /      August 2008 /      September 2008 /      October 2008 /      November 2008 /      December 2008 /      January 2009 /      February 2009 /      March 2009 /      April 2009 /      May 2009 /      June 2009 /      July 2009 /      August 2009 /      September 2009 /      October 2009 /      November 2009 /      December 2009 /      January 2010 /      February 2010 /      March 2010 /      April 2010 /      May 2010 /      June 2010 /      July 2010 /      August 2010 /      September 2010 /      October 2010 /      November 2010 /      December 2010 /      January 2011 /      February 2011 /      March 2011 /      April 2011 /      May 2011 /      June 2011 /      July 2011 /      August 2011 /      September 2011 /      October 2011 /      November 2011 /      December 2011 /      January 2012 /      February 2012 /      March 2012 /      April 2012 /      May 2012 /      June 2012 /      July 2012 /      August 2012 /      September 2012 /      October 2012 /      November 2012 /      December 2012 /      January 2013 /      February 2013 /      March 2013 /      April 2013 /      May 2013 /      June 2013 /      July 2013 /      August 2013 /      September 2013 /      October 2013 /      November 2013 /      December 2013 /      January 2014 /      February 2014 /      March 2014 /      April 2014 /      May 2014 /      June 2014 /      July 2014 /      August 2014 /      September 2014 /      October 2014 /      November 2014 /      December 2014 /      January 2015 /      February 2015 /      March 2015 /      April 2015 /      May 2015 /      June 2015 /      July 2015 /      August 2015 /      September 2015 /      October 2015 /      November 2015 /      December 2015 /      January 2016 /      February 2016 /      March 2016 /      April 2016 /      June 2016 /      July 2016 /      August 2016 /      September 2016 /      October 2016 /      November 2016 /      December 2016 /      January 2017 /      February 2017 /      March 2017 /      May 2017 /      June 2017 /      July 2017 /      August 2017 /      September 2017 /      October 2017 /      November 2017 /      December 2017 /      January 2018 /      March 2018 /      April 2018 /      May 2018 /      June 2018 /      August 2018 /      September 2018 /      October 2018 /      November 2018 /      December 2018 /      February 2019 /      April 2019 /      May 2019 /      June 2019 /      July 2019 /      August 2019 /      September 2019 /      October 2019 /      December 2019 /      January 2020 /      March 2020 /      April 2020 /      May 2020 /      June 2020 /      August 2020 /      October 2020 /      January 2021 /      March 2021 /      May 2021 /      September 2021 /

       Rebecca Crowell